returns all items on a locations, this allows is to
remove quite a bit of code in the dropping.lua file
of world conquest since that can now just use items.lua
instead
This adds an additional `test_result` attribute to [endlevel], intended for use with the automated unit tests. This allows for the unit tests to differentiate a pass/fail result separately from scenario victory or defeat, which allows for more accurately determining the outcome of a test as well as addresses the potential, for example, for a scenario to be expect to pass because of the {SUCCEED} macro but instead passes because the scenario ended as a victory through some other method.
Additional unit tests which were the original motivation for this change are also added as part of this. They test, as much as possible, that events are executed at all, and are then also executed in the expected order.
One of the cases fails due to something in find_vacant_tile - perhaps someone else can figure out how to fix this?
If nothing else, setting check_passability=no in the [move_unit] should do it, but I'd prefer not to have to do that...
Also extend the unit test to at least check the end result of comma-separated
values, as there was previously nothing testing the effect of providing more
than one value.
This reverts commit 51d6402453db08d3add2cdb571abbf1d60272142.
After discussion with @gfgtdf it was determined that this is not a useful feature after all, since it was in fact the default behaviour for the optimized path.
Also backtracked the removal of wesnoth.get_recall_units, which is now available as wesnoth.units.find_on_recall - it's just more convenient than passing x=recall to wesnoth.units.find
Adding this is issue 2 of #4177, changing the behavior when [find_path]
is given a SLF which matches multiple hexes.
The map and tests here should be easy enough for manually editing them. It
duplicates some of the functionality of the existing characterize_pathfinding
tests, however those tests need their expected values to be calculated and
can't be changed by hand.
'''nearest_by''': {DevFeature1.15|2} possible values "movement_cost"
(default), "steps", "hexes". If the [destination] SLF matches multiple hexes,
the one that would need the least movement points to reach may not be the one
that's closest as measured by '''hexes''', or closest as measured by steps,
from the starting point.
Behavior in 1.14 depended on which hex was checked first.
